← All insights

A life worth living

Mieko Kamiya, and the book on ikigai you have probably not read

There is a book that most Western readers will never read, because it has never been translated into English. It is called Ikigai ni tsuiteAbout Ikigai — and it was written in 1966 by a Japanese psychiatrist named Mieko Kamiya. If you have encountered the word ikigai through the internet, through a viral article or a self-help book, you have probably not encountered Kamiya. This is a shame. Everything meaningful anyone has said about ikigai in English is a downstream reflection of what she said first, in Japanese, on the island of Nagashima.

Kamiya was born in 1914. She studied medicine, translated Marcus Aurelius into Japanese in her twenties, and after the war moved to Nagashima Airaku-en — a national sanatorium for patients with Hansen’s disease. It was there, among people who had been isolated from society for years, many facing progressive disability, all of them looking for a reason to continue, that she began to think seriously about what makes a life feel worth living.

The book she wrote is not a self-help book. It is a philosophical anthropology. It asks the question in its most rigorous form — ikigai to wa nan de arō ka?, what is this thing, ikigai? — and answers with unusual patience.

Her central claim is that ikigai has two dimensions.

The first she called ikigai-taishō — the source. The thing you look toward. The object of your caring. The reason to get out of bed. A person, a task, a garden, a religion, a family, a piece of work, a hope. It is rarely one thing. Any person may have several. They can shift with the seasons of a life.

The second she called ikigai-kan — the feeling. The subjective sensation of your life being worth living. This is not the same as happiness. Happiness is easily disturbed by circumstance. Ikigai-kan is quieter — a background hum. It is what a person means when they say, “even in the hardest time, I felt my life had a shape.”

Kamiya’s patients taught her that these two dimensions can come apart in strange ways. A person can have many sources of ikigai and yet feel their life is empty, if the sources feel imposed rather than chosen. A person can have very few sources — one relationship, one ritual — and feel a full ikigai-kan, if that source is deeply their own. Ikigai, she came to believe, is not a matter of quantity. It is a matter of fit — how well what you care about answers to who you are.

She identified seven common sources of ikigai from her observations:

  • The sense of usefulness or purpose
  • The joy of learning or self-development
  • Deep relationships with people
  • The freedom to choose one’s own life
  • The felt continuity of past and future
  • Meaningful daily rituals
  • A vision of one’s own life as worthwhile

You will notice that only one of the seven is directly about work. This is deliberate. Her patients, many of whom could no longer work in any conventional sense, taught her that ikigai does not depend on career. It depends on care.

What is quiet in her book, but everywhere present, is a certain kind of resistance to the idea that ikigai is a thing to discover — as though it were a hidden treasure inside you, waiting to be found. She writes of ikigai as something that develops. That is cultivated. Through the daily acts by which we choose to spend our attention. Her patients, deprived of most of what healthy people take for granted, developed ikigai by carefully tending what remained. A morning greeting to a friend. A window planted with flowers. A book returned to. Small acts, chosen deliberately, repeated.

There is a difference, Kamiya is quietly telling us, between a life that is worth living and a life that feels worth living, and the difference is not in the circumstances. It is in the practice.


This is the ikigai that most of the Western Venn-diagram literature quietly loses. Kamiya’s ikigai does not live at the intersection of what you love, what you are good at, what the world needs, and what you can be paid for. Kamiya’s ikigai lives in the small, repeated acts through which you tend the sources of meaning already in your life — some of which have nothing to do with your career, and none of which will show up on a personality test.

This site exists to help with the career-shaped question, which is loud and pressing and worth answering. But if you want to understand ikigai as the Japanese have understood it for half a century, you should also ask — quietly, and often — what you are tending. What you are returning to. What you are cultivating.

Kamiya’s book has never been translated. The best English-language treatment of her ideas is Gordon Mathews’ work (see below). But even without her book, her question is available to you.

What am I making worth living?


Further reading

  • Kamiya, Mieko (1966). Ikigai ni tsuite [About Ikigai]. Misuzu Shobo. (Untranslated.)
  • Mathews, Gordon (1996). What Makes Life Worth Living? How Japanese and Americans Make Sense of Their Worlds. University of California Press. (The best English introduction to Kamiya’s thinking.)
  • Kotera, Yasuhiro, & Van Gordon, William (2020). “Effects of self-compassion training on work-related well-being: A systematic review.” Frontiers in Psychology, 11. (Contemporary research linking ikigai-like constructs to wellbeing.)